<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>[protofusion] &#187; user interface</title> <atom:link href="http://protofusion.org/wordpress/tag/user-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://protofusion.org/wordpress</link> <description>Generally Interesting</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Multitouch: Fundamental Feature or Fad?</title><link>http://protofusion.org/wordpress/2009/10/multitouch-fundamental-feature-or-fad/</link> <comments>http://protofusion.org/wordpress/2009/10/multitouch-fundamental-feature-or-fad/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:50:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ethan Zonca</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[computers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://protofusion.org/wordpress/?p=150</guid> <description><![CDATA[Popularized with the ever-present  iPhone and expanding into the tablet and desktop sector by companies such as Dell and HP, ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
title="Multitouch" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/98/234302780_f34752b017.jpg" alt="" width="380" height="285" /></p><p>Popularized with the ever-present  iPhone and expanding into the tablet and desktop sector by companies such as Dell and HP, multitouch is becoming an interesting addition to today&#8217;s user interfaces. Overseas companies, such as Asus, are also taking advantage of the technology in new inexpensive tablets; even Gateway is offering a mulititouch tablet these days. Despite the popularity of multitouch, especially on the mobile platform, it seems like a technology with stunted growth and limited applications.</p><p><span
id="more-150"></span></p><h2>Key points (if you&#8217;re too lazy to read the article)</h2><ul><li> Today&#8217;s interfaces are not designed for multitouch</li><li>Multitouch would require redesigning and rethinking of most GUIs<ul><li>Multitouch often wastes screen real estate</li><li>With multitouch, one often can&#8217;t see what&#8217;s under one&#8217;s finger</li><li>Multitouch requires larger on-screen items for finger interaction</li></ul></li><li>Do we need multitouch? What advantages does it pose?<ul><li>Multitouch provides a more organic interface between human and computer</li><li>Multitouch allows simultaneous on-screen manipulation of multiple objects</li></ul></li></ul><h2>No GUI Support</h2><p>Most modern GUIs have little to no support for multi-touch technology. One prime example of this is Windows 7, which came with multitouch built-in, but the software updates have little impact on end-user experience. Multitouch is still limited to a specific audience in Windows 7, as navigating through the &#8220;All Programs&#8221; in the start menu, clicking on links in web pages, and using system tray icons are all quite challenging using one&#8217;s fingers. Also, multitouch gestures are not well-implemented into the operating system. To be extremely effective, Windows should have bindings for custom gestures, or at least include more default gestures for the base operating system itself.</p><p>Current applications are also severely limited with multitouch interactions, as most applications available today have small hard-to-tap virtual buttons. Including larger buttons wastes screen real-estate and can be a bit unsightly. Many applications also require keyboard input to accomplish a variety of functions. It would be extremely challenging to implement numerous keyboard-based functions into on-screen gestures and buttons. One other prominent issue with touchscreens in general is that one&#8217;s finger obscures the item that is being clicked, which makes clicking small objects extremely challenging.</p><h2>No Need</h2><p>Next comes the big question: do we really need multitouch? Many people have the opinion that navigation is much faster with a keyboard and mouse than a touchscreen. This is true for most applications, such as web browsing that involves a good deal of typing and link-clicking.</p><h2>Advantages</h2><p>Despite the downsides stated, multitouch does provide some advantages to human-computer interaction. For instance, multitouch  allows manipulation of multiple objects, or multiple characteristics of objects, at the same time. One simple example of multi-object interaction would be a digital soundboard, where sliders and dials must often be adjusted simultaneously. This would be impossible using a single mouse pointer, and would not allow precise control of speed with a keyboard.</p><p>Multitouch also provides for more organic interaction with computers, allowing the manipulation of digital data in a more physical manner. This interaction could be flipping through photos, organizing files, or moving windows around the desktop.</p><h6><em>Image courtesy of <a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hackaday/">RobotSkirt</a></em></h6><div
id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/98/234302780_f34752b017.jpg</div> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://protofusion.org/wordpress/2009/10/multitouch-fundamental-feature-or-fad/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 309/370 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: pf-wordpress.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: protofusion.org @ 2012-02-05 13:17:45 -->
