<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>[protofusion] &#187; computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://protofusion.org/wordpress/tag/computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://protofusion.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Generally Interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:22:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multitouch: Fundamental Feature or Fad?</title>
		<link>http://protofusion.org/wordpress/2009/10/multitouch-fundamental-feature-or-fad/</link>
		<comments>http://protofusion.org/wordpress/2009/10/multitouch-fundamental-feature-or-fad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Zonca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protofusion.org/wordpress/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popularized with the ever-present  iPhone and expanding into the tablet and desktop sector by companies such as Dell and HP, ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="Multitouch" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/98/234302780_f34752b017.jpg" alt="" width="380" height="285" /></p>
<p>Popularized with the ever-present  iPhone and expanding into the tablet and desktop sector by companies such as Dell and HP, multitouch is becoming an interesting addition to today&#8217;s user interfaces. Overseas companies, such as Asus, are also taking advantage of the technology in new inexpensive tablets; even Gateway is offering a mulititouch tablet these days. Despite the popularity of multitouch, especially on the mobile platform, it seems like a technology with stunted growth and limited applications.</p>
<p><span id="more-150"></span></p>
<h2>Key points (if you&#8217;re too lazy to read the article)</h2>
<ul>
<li> Today&#8217;s interfaces are not designed for multitouch</li>
<li>Multitouch would require redesigning and rethinking of most GUIs
<ul>
<li>Multitouch often wastes screen real estate</li>
<li>With multitouch, one often can&#8217;t see what&#8217;s under one&#8217;s finger</li>
<li>Multitouch requires larger on-screen items for finger interaction</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Do we need multitouch? What advantages does it pose?
<ul>
<li>Multitouch provides a more organic interface between human and computer</li>
<li>Multitouch allows simultaneous on-screen manipulation of multiple objects</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>No GUI Support</h2>
<p>Most modern GUIs have little to no support for multi-touch technology. One prime example of this is Windows 7, which came with multitouch built-in, but the software updates have little impact on end-user experience. Multitouch is still limited to a specific audience in Windows 7, as navigating through the &#8220;All Programs&#8221; in the start menu, clicking on links in web pages, and using system tray icons are all quite challenging using one&#8217;s fingers. Also, multitouch gestures are not well-implemented into the operating system. To be extremely effective, Windows should have bindings for custom gestures, or at least include more default gestures for the base operating system itself.</p>
<p>Current applications are also severely limited with multitouch interactions, as most applications available today have small hard-to-tap virtual buttons. Including larger buttons wastes screen real-estate and can be a bit unsightly. Many applications also require keyboard input to accomplish a variety of functions. It would be extremely challenging to implement numerous keyboard-based functions into on-screen gestures and buttons. One other prominent issue with touchscreens in general is that one&#8217;s finger obscures the item that is being clicked, which makes clicking small objects extremely challenging.</p>
<h2>No Need</h2>
<p>Next comes the big question: do we really need multitouch? Many people have the opinion that navigation is much faster with a keyboard and mouse than a touchscreen. This is true for most applications, such as web browsing that involves a good deal of typing and link-clicking.</p>
<h2>Advantages</h2>
<p>Despite the downsides stated, multitouch does provide some advantages to human-computer interaction. For instance, multitouch  allows manipulation of multiple objects, or multiple characteristics of objects, at the same time. One simple example of multi-object interaction would be a digital soundboard, where sliders and dials must often be adjusted simultaneously. This would be impossible using a single mouse pointer, and would not allow precise control of speed with a keyboard.</p>
<p>Multitouch also provides for more organic interaction with computers, allowing the manipulation of digital data in a more physical manner. This interaction could be flipping through photos, organizing files, or moving windows around the desktop.</p>
<h6><em>Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hackaday/">RobotSkirt</a></em></h6>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/98/234302780_f34752b017.jpg</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protofusion.org/wordpress/2009/10/multitouch-fundamental-feature-or-fad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
